The school called the mother in the first place and buzzed her in.
If they thought she was unhinged and a danger, they would not have buzzed her in.
The whole *point* of a buzzed in system is that you have the option of *not* buzzing someone in if the evidence suggests that someone means to harm others.
No, everyone is buzzed in ... and then they proceed to the office to be identified. The “transaction of identification” does not happen at the door and at the buzzer. That “identification” happens at the office. In the office they have all the legal paperwork, which was signed at the beginning of the year which specifies who has the legal authority to have access to a child in school.
Since there are many kids in school, that may have to be looked up from the legal paperwork which was signed. And the person may have to show identification to verify who they are.
In my case, the mother IS NOT ALLOWED in the school. So ... just because you think a mother should be allowed in, doesn’t make it so.
If they thought she was unhinged and a danger, they would not have buzzed her in.
It could be as simple as she was calm and normal when she was buzzed in and once in she became belligerent and as I said become "unhinged"
This smells like she is has perpetually victim mentally..
They know how to work the system to manipulate the rules to get her way...
Of course I'm just speculating...
IF they thought she was ‘unhinged’—why would they have called her in the first place?
Have her declare an alternate person to call when there is trouble—someone who can interface with ‘disruptive kid’ & ‘unhinged mom’.