[Repeal The 17th]

An Article V Convention of States cannot amend the Constitution.
-
The State resolutions calling for an Article V Convention of States must all use the same language.
"...for the purpose of proposing amendments to the Constitution which:
- Impose fiscal restraints on the Federal Government;
- Limit the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Government; and
- Limit the terms of office for federal officials and members of Congress."
-
An Article V Convention of States is simply a formal gathering of delegates
by at least 34 states, to discuss, debate, and "propose amendments" to the Constitution.
-

Any proposal not within the stated purpose of the Convention of States
(fiscal restraints; limits on power and jurisdiction; limits on terms of office)
would be unauthorized, rejected, and not approved by the Convention of States.
-
Any proposal that emerged as a "proposed amendment" by the Convention of States
would still require ratification by 38 states, the same as with any other proposed amendment.

[PapaNew]

The State resolutions calling for an Article V Convention of States must all use the same language.
- Impose fiscal restraints on the Federal Government;
- Limit the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Government; and
- Limit the terms of office for federal officials and members of Congress."
Any proposal not within the stated purpose of the Convention of States (fiscal restraints; limits on power and jurisdiction; limits on terms of office) would be unauthorized, rejected, and not approved by the Convention of States.

Where does this language come from? To be honest, it's a relief to see that language.