Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

Okay, this is the kind of scientific reporting that annoys me to no end. First of all, it seems to be saying that gestational diabetes causes heart disease later on, but that is not the case. The most likely explanation is that the risk factors that cause women to be predisposed towards developing gestational diabetes also predispose women towards heart disease later on. So the risk-lowering behaviors work equally well towards preventing both diseases.

Also, “researchers discovered a 0.023 mm bigger average carotid artery intima-media thickness”—seriously? I bet that tiny measurement difference is well within the margin of error, and that any two populations selected at random would show at least that much difference in their average measurements. What are the CIs, anyway?

Grr. Sloppy science and scientific reporting always annoy me.


3 posted on 03/16/2014 6:17:40 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

BTW, I went to the source and looked at the CIs. I’m still not impressed.

*Sigh*

The bottom line is that healthy behavior prevents many unhealthy outcomes, and that one should always endeavor to eat properly and exercise.


4 posted on 03/16/2014 6:25:45 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson