#5 is a ridiculous criticism, and really takes away from the first 4, even if they are valid. The one year scale is simply used to help our brains deal with the vastness of “billions of years”, and put it into a perspective that we can comprehend.
Agree
Agree
And I think the emphasis on Bruno was because he’s so little known, compared to Kepler and Galileo.
Spot on. Even the Low Information Voters can comprehend the compression of all suspected history since the Big Band into a single year.
However, what I would like to see is putting all of the recorded climatological data used to “prove” glo-bull warming into that same time compression model. Perhaps when people realize that we’ve been tracking these patterns for maybe the last millisecond or two of recorded time, we “doubters” might get the credibility we are due.