Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MrShoop
I believe such monitoring is readily available and still untainted by the hand of bureaucrats.

http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/swcrc/37/chap2.htm

http://www.bikiniatoll.com/whatrad.html

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/02/bikini-atoll-nuclear-test-60-years

It's still claimed to be unlivable after 60 years, but I would take that with a grain of salt if you consider Hiroshima and Nagasaki with the caveat the both Japanese sites were actively “decontaminated” while the Bikini Atoll was not.

72 posted on 03/09/2014 8:17:38 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Pox

“It’s still claimed to be unlivable after 60 years, but I would take that with a grain of salt if you consider Hiroshima and Nagasaki with the caveat the both Japanese sites were actively “decontaminated” while the Bikini Atoll was not.”

That atoll blast(s) actually hit the ground, I think that those may have been hydrogen based, and blew part of the atoll itself away; the Japan blasts were in the air which is “cleaner”.


95 posted on 03/09/2014 8:42:52 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson