Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: saywhatagain
I had asked the same question earlier, it appears the 2 hr. mark was(if not erroneous altogether)when the aircraft was deemed to actually be missing by the airline.

("when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth”)

...while actual loss of signal was(+/-)40 min. after T.O.(Flight24 ADS-B plotting)

...at least that's how I interpreted the timeline up till now.

67 posted on 03/08/2014 9:10:03 PM PST by RckyRaCoCo (Shall Not Be Infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: RckyRaCoCo
Think report I mentioned earlier from/of north of Ho Chi Mien City is bogus ... Weather looks fine in the area and is hot (880) and cloudless. I also agree with your timeline.
70 posted on 03/08/2014 9:15:08 PM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: RckyRaCoCo
Loss of signal 40 minutes after takeoff?

That piece of data is the most sense of all the data i had read so far. And is probably most accurate. I thought i read they had just reached top of climb then disappeared. Top of climb depending on stairstepping et all takes 25 to 30 minutes. That makes 40 minutes and the location they are looking at more reasonable.

First report i read said disappearing two hours after departure. Arghhhh why do i even read all the bs immediately after an incident or crash. Half of it is bs.

Thank you for the correction and heads up

72 posted on 03/08/2014 9:21:26 PM PST by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson