[Kevmo]

Straw argument. That ain’t what I said — you’re propping up a caricature of the argument so you can argue against it. Typical of the average skeptopath.

[D-fendr]

First, you disagree with this:

Consistent reproducible experiments are part of scientific proof whether you wish it or not.

And now you disagree with it's converse:

Inconsistent non-reproducible experiments are the scientific way to prove hypotheses.

Consistency is helpful also in debate.

It seems now we are off on arguments about arguments. My interest in this is not sufficient to participate, particularly when your ad hominems continue.

Thanks for your replies, and adios, amigo...