To: Kevmo
Now all that remains is that you somehow prove that ALL of the 14720 replications (more since then) were due to H202. That's silly. You said
The data on this phenomenon is very consistent — the heat generated is several orders of magnitude more than could be possible with any known chemical reaction.
I disproved your claim on the very first "replication" I looked at.
206 posted on
03/12/2014 10:03:31 PM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
You didn't prove sheeitte. The vast majority of the 14,700 replications didn't have H202, they had simple water as the input. Or are you postulating that all those guys were in on a conspiracy?
207 posted on
03/12/2014 10:26:57 PM PDT by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
Now you’re just talking bowlsheet. Explain away 14000 replications.
208 posted on
03/12/2014 10:27:50 PM PDT by
Kevmo
("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson