Patently absurd! British law can hardly make American citizens of anyone. But that's you're way, isn't it? Spreading confusion, assuming facts not in evidence, using poor grammar--that's what you do.
Until verified, non-forged evidence of Barry's parentage and other birth data is made public, no analogies may be considered valid, precedent-setting, or supporting case law for the current case in question.
HF
Two apple trees make an apple. Thats Natural. It can only produce one thing, naturally. An apple.
Cross pollinate fruit trees, you get something unnatural.
The use of the word has not changed since 1776.
No amount of obfuscation will make Obama a legal president.
He is our first illegally elected president.
It appears to me that you might have misunderstood what I wrote. British law made James Buchanan Senior and his son BRITISH citizens for life, not American citizens. Both Buchanans also had American citizenship by virtue of American law.
British law also made Chester A. Arthur and his father British citizens but the law was changed in 1870 so that Chester A. Arthur lost his British citizenship at that time.
British law also made Barack Obama Senior and Barack Obama II British Empire citizens (the official designation was “Citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (CUKC)”), but when Kenya gained independance, both Obamas lost British Empire citizenship and gained Kenyan citizenship. Barack Obama II lost Kenyan citizenship in 1983 when he did not select it. Kenyan law did not permit dual citizenship.
The state of Hawaii has confirmed Obama’s original birth vital record and nineteen different court decisions have ruled him to qualify as a natural born citizen for Article II, Section 1 purposes.
Here’s one example of a ruling:
Purpura & Moran v Obama: New Jersey Administrative Law Judge Jeff S. Masin: “No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.” April 10, 2012