sr4402 replied (with which I totally agree): God claims he superintended the writing of Scripture so that it is without error and worthy of our full trust. The verbal argument can be used to justify weaseling anything into any any ones mouth or history for their own purposes.
To which I add: It isn't so much about recording all the words that Jesus said or the things that He did. John said in John 21:25 that the world could not contain all the books that would be written. But John also said in his gospel in chapter 20 that the things that were written were written "so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in His name."
The gospels, along with all of the rest of scripture are written to teach us WHO God is (the triune God) and who we are (sinners) so that we come to repentance knowing that we are sinners and that we need a Savior - Jesus Christ the Lord.
It isn't about refuting the Bible, for the Bible is the Word, and that Word was made flesh and dwelt among us. If one tries to refute the Word, or take away from it, or add from it, then they are trying to change WHO God is. And that is what this movie does. Period. And that will not bode well with those who made it. Something about a millstone around their neck??? =:o
I don't see this at all. Question, then: What is the difference between what you observe here and the revising of the Bible under King James and leaving out several books because the writers of that time did not consider those books to be canonical?