Skip to comments.
PHOTOS - circa 1927: Submarine Aircraft Carrier
Retronaut ^
| 1927
| Retronaut
Posted on 03/02/2014 10:54:01 AM PST by DogByte6RER
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Interesting history about modern naval warfare ...
To: DogByte6RER
I suspect landings are real tricky.
2
posted on
03/02/2014 10:55:56 AM PST
by
umgud
(2A can't survive dem majorities)
To: umgud
The plane had pontoons, so I don’t think it was much of a problem. What I’m more concerned with is the amount of G’s a pilot was subject to, taking off on a platform not much longer than the plane itself.
3
posted on
03/02/2014 10:57:46 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(I'm a pessimist, I say plenty of negative things. Consider it a warning of sorts.)
To: umgud
Okay hold you breath in 3 2 1...........
4
posted on
03/02/2014 10:58:03 AM PST
by
Dr. Ursus
To: DogByte6RER
Talk about true men. Big time tough guys.
5
posted on
03/02/2014 11:05:54 AM PST
by
albie
To: Dr. Ursus
The Lucas Electric hangar door controls operated as well as could be expected in damp conditions..
The engine for the Peto (Latin for "fart," actually) lived on in the Hillman Minx Station Wagon of 1954.
Fly English
Fly the best
Fly 'bout a mile,
Swim the rest.
6
posted on
03/02/2014 11:08:44 AM PST
by
Kenny Bunk
(Don't let the aftershave and embalming fluid fool you. Many RINOs are actually dead meat.)
To: DogByte6RER
I bet current submarines could launch drones if need be.
7
posted on
03/02/2014 11:09:08 AM PST
by
null and void
(<--- unwilling cattle-car passenger on the bullet train to serfdom)
To: null and void
8
posted on
03/02/2014 11:13:59 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
To: null and void
9
posted on
03/02/2014 11:15:11 AM PST
by
rottndog
('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
To: wastedyears
What Im more concerned with is the amount of Gs a pilot was subject to, taking off on a platform not much longer than the plane itself.The sub probably was going full speed astern into the wind. The launch ramp extends about 30 feet or so beyond the airplanes propeller. Given a takeoff speed of about 50mph, the G-force of launching shouldn't be excessive.
10
posted on
03/02/2014 11:26:15 AM PST
by
fso301
To: DogByte6RER
The Japs had similar subs.
11
posted on
03/02/2014 11:29:51 AM PST
by
iowamark
(I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
To: DogByte6RER; null and void
Woo Hoo!
Less than $3.3k to go!!
GIT-R-DONE!
Make Today, Day 61 the day!
13
posted on
03/02/2014 11:34:48 AM PST
by
RedMDer
(May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
To: rottndog
Regulus 1955
14
posted on
03/02/2014 12:15:33 PM PST
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: wastedyears
Possibly just hopped into the water and took off like a seaplane
15
posted on
03/02/2014 12:25:00 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
To: fella
My only question about sub launched drones...how quietly can this be done?
These kinds of ops would most likely take place close to land, and well within coastal defenses of foreign countries who could likely have some semblance of a submarine force. This would make the drone launching boat quite vulnerable to detection and attack, IMHO.
16
posted on
03/02/2014 12:26:28 PM PST
by
rottndog
('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
To: Kenny Bunk
Yet another reason to convert from Lucas to Bosch.
17
posted on
03/02/2014 1:00:28 PM PST
by
elcid1970
("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
To: rottndog
A Regulus launch Not so stealthy. And
longer launch.
Now days they can float one to the surface and let it set there while the sub left the area before the drones launch.
18
posted on
03/02/2014 1:27:26 PM PST
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: fso301
The sub probably was going full speed astern into the wind.
Not likely. First off, with an antiquated propeller driven pontoon plane such as this, you're going to need a heck of a lot more than 30 ft. to reach 50 MPH.......
To launch the plane, the sub released the holdings on the pontoons, went under water then let the plane do what pontoon aircraft usually do while on water.......take off.
The 30 ft. deck was designed to accomodate the sub's ability to surface under the pontoon plane once it had landed on water.........
19
posted on
03/02/2014 1:40:07 PM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
(Was Occam's razor made by Gillette?)
To: Hot Tabasco
The 30 ft. deck was designed to accomodate the sub's ability to surface under the pontoon plane once it had landed on water......... Could be but does that mean the 3rd photo is of the plane doing a close flyby rather than taking off?
20
posted on
03/02/2014 2:57:10 PM PST
by
fso301
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson