Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PHOTOS - circa 1927: Submarine Aircraft Carrier
Retronaut ^ | 1927 | Retronaut

Posted on 03/02/2014 10:54:01 AM PST by DogByte6RER

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Interesting history about modern naval warfare ...
1 posted on 03/02/2014 10:54:01 AM PST by DogByte6RER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

I suspect landings are real tricky.


2 posted on 03/02/2014 10:55:56 AM PST by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

The plane had pontoons, so I don’t think it was much of a problem. What I’m more concerned with is the amount of G’s a pilot was subject to, taking off on a platform not much longer than the plane itself.


3 posted on 03/02/2014 10:57:46 AM PST by wastedyears (I'm a pessimist, I say plenty of negative things. Consider it a warning of sorts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Okay hold you breath in 3 2 1...........


4 posted on 03/02/2014 10:58:03 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Talk about true men. Big time tough guys.


5 posted on 03/02/2014 11:05:54 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus
The Lucas Electric hangar door controls operated as well as could be expected in damp conditions..

The engine for the Peto (Latin for "fart," actually) lived on in the Hillman Minx Station Wagon of 1954.

Fly English
Fly the best
Fly 'bout a mile,
Swim the rest.

6 posted on 03/02/2014 11:08:44 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Don't let the aftershave and embalming fluid fool you. Many RINOs are actually dead meat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

I bet current submarines could launch drones if need be.


7 posted on 03/02/2014 11:09:08 AM PST by null and void (<--- unwilling cattle-car passenger on the bullet train to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

8 posted on 03/02/2014 11:13:59 AM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I bet current submarines could launch drones if need be.
9 posted on 03/02/2014 11:15:11 AM PST by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
What I’m more concerned with is the amount of G’s a pilot was subject to, taking off on a platform not much longer than the plane itself.

The sub probably was going full speed astern into the wind. The launch ramp extends about 30 feet or so beyond the airplanes propeller. Given a takeoff speed of about 50mph, the G-force of launching shouldn't be excessive.

10 posted on 03/02/2014 11:26:15 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

The Japs had similar subs.


11 posted on 03/02/2014 11:29:51 AM PST by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER; null and void
The WWII Japanese I-400 class was so impressive the US Navy sank them to keep them from the Russians (perhaps preaching to the choir, I realize).

Imperial Japanese Naval Aircraft Carrier Submarine PAGE.

And http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1366913/posts

and US Navy Submarine-launched XFC drone

12 posted on 03/02/2014 11:30:15 AM PST by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Woo Hoo!

Less than $3.3k to go!!
GIT-R-DONE!

Make Today, Day 61 the day!

13 posted on 03/02/2014 11:34:48 AM PST by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rottndog

Regulus 1955

14 posted on 03/02/2014 12:15:33 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Possibly just hopped into the water and took off like a seaplane


15 posted on 03/02/2014 12:25:00 PM PST by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fella

My only question about sub launched drones...how quietly can this be done?

These kinds of ops would most likely take place close to land, and well within coastal defenses of foreign countries who could likely have some semblance of a submarine force. This would make the drone launching boat quite vulnerable to detection and attack, IMHO.


16 posted on 03/02/2014 12:26:28 PM PST by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Yet another reason to convert from Lucas to Bosch.


17 posted on 03/02/2014 1:00:28 PM PST by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rottndog
A Regulus launch Not so stealthy. And longer launch.

Now days they can float one to the surface and let it set there while the sub left the area before the drones launch.

18 posted on 03/02/2014 1:27:26 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fso301
The sub probably was going full speed astern into the wind.

Not likely. First off, with an antiquated propeller driven pontoon plane such as this, you're going to need a heck of a lot more than 30 ft. to reach 50 MPH.......

To launch the plane, the sub released the holdings on the pontoons, went under water then let the plane do what pontoon aircraft usually do while on water.......take off.

The 30 ft. deck was designed to accomodate the sub's ability to surface under the pontoon plane once it had landed on water.........

19 posted on 03/02/2014 1:40:07 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Was Occam's razor made by Gillette?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
The 30 ft. deck was designed to accomodate the sub's ability to surface under the pontoon plane once it had landed on water.........

Could be but does that mean the 3rd photo is of the plane doing a close flyby rather than taking off?

20 posted on 03/02/2014 2:57:10 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson