[Balding_Eagle]

It appears you think the case was so weak you had to make up things to bolster your side for gun grabbing.

As reported in the orginal article, the situation is very different from your lie:

“As Mr Hendrix’s financee called 911 the 34-year-old confronted the stranger outside his house and, when Mr Westbrook walked towards the house without identifying himself, Mr Hendrix fired.”

Perhaps you are an MSNBC employee?

[Uncle Chip]

Apparently you can't read and if you can you are incapable or reasoning. You obviously missed this:

Ronald Westbrook rang the doorbell of a home at 4am

He rang the doorbell but was shot in the front yard.

As reported in the orginal article, the situation is very different from YOUR lie.

[Uncle Chip]

when Mr Westbrook walked towards the house without identifying himself, Mr Hendrix fired.

That's some nice BS additive that Hendrix worked up on the advice of counsel because his original statement was this:

he fired four shots after Westbrook ignored commands to stop, identify himself and raise his hands.

Hendrix was the aggressor doing the confronting after Westbrook rang the doorbell and began walking away.

Furthermore he shot him not because he was afraid but, by his own admission, because the guy would not follow his orders to stop, put his hands up and identify himself.

That's not self-defense nor is it SYG nor is it the purpose for having a weapon.

It's murder.