I'm not offended. So no need to apologize, but I appreciate the gesture.
I want to underscore my objections to the article. You made the following statement to me @ post #15:
By your last two posts you would fit the description in the article.
Why didn't you make a similar comment regarding post #8?
And here's my point concerning the validity of the article:
My first comment (
#12) to this thread included the statement objecting to the article:
And I think it’s interesting that opinion affecting the credibility of the news story is essentially deemed as hostile to discourse and understanding.
And in response to my post, you made the following remark(
#15):
By your last two posts you would fit the description in the article.
So in my being critical of the article, you referred to posts I made elsewhere to discredit the opinion I provided here. You didn't criticize the "bull$hit" comment in post
#8, but you criticized mine.
In my disagreeing with the article you posted, you attacked my credibility. Given the subject of the article, I found this quite humorous.