To: Obama_Is_A_Feminist
So....if one occupant is committing crimes against the other, the criminal can veto the victim? Yeah. That makes sense.
17 posted on
02/25/2014 5:18:14 PM PST by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: lepton
Or if one occupant has dementia and says “okay” when the other occupant refuses to let the officer in without a warrant....
Be careful what you justify in the name of catching criminals. Be really, really careful.
Your liberty is at stake.
21 posted on
02/25/2014 5:22:12 PM PST by
Altariel
("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
To: lepton; Obama_Is_A_Feminist
They were already allowed by law to enter without a warrant in the event of a life threatening emergency inside.
103 posted on
02/25/2014 10:04:35 PM PST by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson