Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg
One could argue that Hitler was one of the biggest advantages to the Allies in WW2. Had someone else ran Nazi Germany, the outcome could have been different.

Very true. Hitler made some incredible military blunders and singlehandedly lost the war to the Allies. The decision to invade the Soviet Union in June 1941 was especially horrendous. Up to that moment, Germany had total control of most of Europe and could have worn down Great Britain at leisure with blockades and by continuing the Blitz. Instead, they send four million troops into Russia and become increasingly bogged down as they quickly outran their supply lines.

This gave the Allies enough breathing space on the Western front to build their military on a colossal scale, which led to the mainland invasions of 1943 (Italy) and 1944 (France).

The Germans had world domination within their grasp but they threw it all away due to giving absolute power to a pin-headed corporal whose only strong point was the ability to give fiery speeches and mesmerize an audience.

49 posted on 02/23/2014 12:04:56 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76

Good thing the guy in charge here isn’t a pin-headed corporal, eh?


56 posted on 02/23/2014 12:12:54 PM PST by null and void (<--- unwilling cattle-car passenger on the bullet train to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
Very true. Hitler made some incredible military blunders and singlehandedly lost the war to the Allies. The decision to invade the Soviet Union in June 1941 was especially horrendous. Up to that moment, Germany had total control of most of Europe and could have worn down Great Britain at leisure with blockades and by continuing the Blitz. Instead, they send four million troops into Russia and become increasingly bogged down as they quickly outran their supply lines.

Following their defeat in Greece, the British hold on the eastern Mediterranean was shaky. Had the Germans pressed their luck in that region--say, invading Cyprus and then moving into Syria and Lebanon, where the French would probably not have resisted, they might have forced the British clear back to India and Kenya.

Another colossal blunder by Hitler was not keeping his mouth shut after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. By going to war with the USSR, then the USA, Germany found itself at war with two continents as well as the British Empire.

88 posted on 02/23/2014 1:38:52 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76

Hitler had no choice but to attack Russia when he did...Stalin was busy beefing up the Red Army to attack the Germans by ‘43, so Hitler knew he had to hit while he still had something of an advantage....While I do not believe that either way Germany was going to prevail, at least attacking when he did gave them at least a fighting chance.

Now the prosecution of Barbarossa itself, is a whole other matter.


90 posted on 02/23/2014 1:43:42 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76
If you'll read the fascinating book Rees Howells Intercessor, you'll get the "rest of the story." Hitler's decision to turn towards Moscow was undoubtedly influenced by intense intercessory prayer.
105 posted on 02/23/2014 5:57:43 PM PST by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson