> She could be selling to drug users anywhere she sells. Would that also mean I condone selling to drug users? All I condone is her freedom to sell cookies whereever she has a right to sell them. That is not the same as condoning a girlscout selling to drug users.
But she speciically chose a place she where there would be drug users. I wonder where a lot of those “medical patients” get there money to buy their drugs? I’d bet quite a bit if it comes directly or indirectly from soical programs hich means the taxpayers are not only paying for the drugs, they’re pying or their munchies too. So tell me, do you inhale?...: )
“But she speciically chose a place she where there would be drug users. I wonder where a lot of those medical patients get there money to buy their drugs? Id bet quite a bit if it comes directly or indirectly from soical programs hich means the taxpayers are not only paying for the drugs, theyre pying or their munchies too. So tell me, do you inhale?...: )”
That was one of the places she chose, not the only one. If she set up outside a church she could sell to drug users, some who might “directly or indirectly from “social” programs “hich” means the taxpayers”.
I’ve already said I’ve never even tried any type of street drug. What about you? Do you spell that bad when you are sober?
speciically
soical
hich
pying
or