“Quasi-One-Dimensional Model of electrochemical loading of isotopic fuel into a metal”

Exposing The Truth.com ^ | Feb 18, 2014 | Jeremy Rys

[reed13k]

You went after him for posting things you don’t agree with and stated no one else cares for his post.

I called you out for the no one else cares part because others do appreciate his posts.

I did not ask you to care - nor does it matter to me if you do.

I do care about you basically telling him that he shouldn’t post just because you don’t agree with him.

Free country, free speech - get it.

[ZX12R]

You went after him for posting things you don’t agree with and stated no one else cares for his post.

I doubt that Kevmo was reduced to tears over my comments, but you seem to be. Go whine at someone else crybaby.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

Well said. Once someone starts bring up “free speech” in a discussion like this you know they’ve lost. I certainly don’t recall you requesting kevmo be jailed for his inanity, so “free speech” is a non-sequitur of the desperate.

[ZX12R]

Well said. Once someone starts bring up “free speech” in a discussion like this you know they’ve lost. I certainly don’t recall you requesting kevmo be jailed for his inanity, so “free speech” is a non-sequitur of the desperate.

Free speech...as long as you can accept the consequential abuse. Good morning.

[Kevmo]

The basic science behind cold fusion is valid. The P-F Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated more than 14,700 times. So that means that if cold fusion is a fraud, CHF is a fraud not 25X more worse, but 25 ORDERS of MAGNITUDE. 25X would only be 1-2 orders of mag.

[Kevmo]

I simply don’t believe that the physics is possible,
***Then log onto the cold fusion theory threads and show us how those several theories are impossible. And show how the effect being replicated 14,700 times was either error or fraud (gigantic conspiracy theory).

Show me. Keep in mind that the mathematical definition of impossible is 1 in 10^50. The chances of 14,700 replications being in error are on the order of 1 in 10^4550. Try to avoid mathematically ridiculous arguments when arguing for impossibility.

————————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg87609.html———————

What you are saying is EXACTLY what Scientific American told the Wright brothers about publishing their paper in 1904, after they had achieved flight: It was impossible, so we won’t do it. They were wrong, unless you somehow think the Wrights were fraudulent???? WTF???

[Kevmo]

The problem is that there is an entire gang of AdamHenry*BandWagon joiners who chime in like you do.

[Kevmo]

I really appreciate your posts because so far, not ONE of them has furthered the science behind LENR. Not one. That’s a record for an AH*BW joiner that is unrivalled.

[tomkat]

i'll have two please, and a side of fries w/gravy

[Kevmo]

Then you admit that it is abuse. That makes you a bit of a despicable freeper, as well as those hordes who join you who aren’t as truthful as you are.

[Kevmo]

But when I do, it’s just to have a little fun at your expense. But I would treat anyone who believes this nonsense, the same exact way, so, you don’t have to take it personally.
***I don’t mind the treatment. What I mind is that when I start giving you guys a dish of your own medicine, the mods step in and remove the thread. So your abuse (and you ADMIT it’s abuse) is a form of vigilante censorship. Not one of the abusers has complained about the LENR thread removals. Not one. Because they want such a thing. It is an incredibly short-sighted anti-scientific attitude.

[reed13k]

I doubt it as well but I see you don’t like to be called on your hyperbole - jerk

[reed13k]

Your incorrect I called him on his comment of no one cares not for his opinion on the science - I (and others) care so he’s wrong by definition. He’s welcome to his opinion that’s the scientific method his attitude that Kevmo shouldn’t post is what I called him on not his opinion on the science. My own opinion on the science hasnt been stated on this thread only that I value the postings.

[from occupied ga]

The P-F Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated more than 14,700 times

[Kevmo]

So, then you think the guys at the Chinese Academy of Science cannot count to 14,000? That makes your blatant ignorance a steaming pile all by itself.

Asked & Answered
-———————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg85732.html-—————

[from occupied ga]

So, then you think the guys at the Chinese Academy of Science cannot count to 14,000?

Not honestly. Peersonally I think cold fusion is total bs, and you're either a fool or a shill for pushing it, but hey that's just the opinion of a Ph.D. in biochemistry

[Kevmo]

If you’re so bigoted about Chinese, then maybe you have faith in Scientific Instruments, the leaders in measurement. After looking at 150 replications, they proclaim that there is a true Anomalous Heating Event taking place. But hey, that’s just the opinion of a multi$billion company coming alongside 14,000 replications.

Since you’re a PhD in biochem, you should look into how many PhDs in electrochemistry replicated this effect. It would open your eyes. But you won’t, because you really don’t uphold science, you’re just a bandwagon joiner. I mean, come on, how much of an AH*BW joiner does one have to be to proclaim that chinese scientists cannot count?

[Kevmo]

Not honestly.
***Best of luck with that crazy conspiracy theory that goes across 14000 replications. Even the Kennedy assassination conspiracy garbage had at most a hundred participants.

You’re bonkers.

[from occupied ga]

When it goes into production, I will acknowledge you’re right. Until then you’re a total bullsh!tter moo

[Kevmo]

asked & answered

————————www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg87557.html-———————