[I want the USA back]

I have to ask why anyone would develop a thing like this, unless the goal is to have humans controlled by others, or a central power.

[jsanders2001]

> I have to ask why anyone would develop a thing like this, unless the goal is to have humans controlled by others, or a central power.

And who funded it. Obvious is obvious. This isn’t for our welfare.

[Boogieman]

Well, if they can use this system to allow a brain to pass signals to the spinal cord of another organism, they could also use it to allow a brain to pass signals to the spinal cord of its own organism. So, if someone has a damaged spinal cord and is paralyzed, this might help them bypass that damage and regain some movement.

[a fool in paradise]

I have to ask why anyone would develop a thing like this, unless the goal is to have humans controlled by others, or a central power.

Wiring it up may be to prove the theoretical of "Rewiring" a brain (in the case of a stroke or other severe damage) or as others have said, to jump over bad "circuitry" in spinal damage.

However it does not seem ethical to do this to two healthy monkey, or to have one drive the other (scientists could do that as well as check for signals from the brain).

The Russians created "two-headed dogs" in the 1950s (they'd live around 2 weeks before infection set in).

I think a US scientist did this with monkeys around 2001 in Cleveland.

There are others who work up designs to keep a severed head alive.