Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rjsimmon

Couple problems.

Pit bulls are more or less the canine equivalent of assault weapons. The definition of which breeds are included is very loose. Often means any large scary dog.

Statistics on dog bites are collected with a very wide degree of reliability.

Any statistic as to number of bites or deaths caused by a particular breed is pretty meaningless without qualification by number of those dogs of that breed in US or percentage of dogs of that breed.

IOW, if (to make up some numbers) 25% of fatal bites are by “pit bulls,” but pit bulls are only 1% of all US dogs, they’re a lot more dangerous than the raw numbers or ranking would indicate.


18 posted on 02/18/2014 1:14:50 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
From 1982 to 2013, dog bite/fatality statistics are pretty clear. Not just percentage wise, but raw numbers.

From the site www.dogsbite.org

Pitbulls: 263 deaths

Rottweiler: 81 deaths (next closest)

Dog Kills

22 posted on 02/18/2014 1:27:00 PM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-2013 The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson