Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

Hoover dam was bigger, and it was continuous.


2 posted on 02/16/2014 4:33:57 PM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

Hoover dam was a lot of separate pours. They allowed the concrete to dry before pouring the next level.


4 posted on 02/16/2014 4:36:46 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

That’s what I was wondering. Certainly the dam couldn’t have been continuous from bottom to top, could it? How would the bottom of the forms withstood the concreto-static pressure till it cured? I’d have assumed they’d pour it like a layer cake in maybe 20-foot layers. Even if it wasn’t, I could still see single pours bigger than this one. But how would Guinness have missed such an obvious one? And what about 3-gorges dam in China? That one’s immense.


18 posted on 02/16/2014 5:31:19 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan

And because when concrete sets up, its an exothermic ( heat producing) process, deep inside Hoover it’s still HOT. The dam actually has hundreds of miles of piping inside the concrete..water runs through it to cool it..


30 posted on 02/16/2014 5:50:58 PM PST by ken5050 (This space available cheap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson