Replies

It's really nice to see folks can come together and debate this.This begins with chatting about what their personal point of view is.The police could first have held open forms allowing the people to chat with them about this issue and next they can decide is this a good idea or bad idea.They could start debating the matter and afterwards put the matter up for the voters to decide on it. Once they chat about it over coffee,at their local bars,restaurants,churches could even be used for all the members of the community to come together and chit chat with each other to get a real feel about what is going on and ,is the majority of the community on board with this or not.This would get the communities involved and open many doors in the communities for residents to come to know each other and some real causal chit chat can lead to making life time new friends and making it all about making the communities better place- safer place to live. As Barack Obama says that talking about our problems will solve our problems.Based on the all comments left, doing some public debating would of been very helpful here.I think they should consulted with the public first.

How is looking at people’s licenses and registrations “checking for speeders?” I thought radar did that. What am I missing?

Is this city cops doing this and does state law allow it? As far as I can tell, Texas is one of the states that doesn't allow suspicionless checkpoints. (I don't know how much leeway Texas cities have within Texas law)