Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gmail Can Now Tell Senders When A Recipient Opens An Email
Mail Online ^ | 12 February 2014 | Victoria Woollaston

Posted on 02/12/2014 6:07:13 PM PST by Windflier

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Ramius
This is a plugin that has to be installed on the client? Can’t we just not install it?

The plugin is designed to be used by the person doing the email tracking, not by his email recipients, who may or may not be using Gmail.

The plugin is part of a larger system designed to turn Gmail into a CRM application. See streak.com.

Demo of Streak email tracking:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_oaWsMjQ8Y.

61 posted on 02/12/2014 8:31:07 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
The usual trick is to embed a 1x1 transparent image in the email with a URL that uniquely identifies the individual email

It should be possible to screen for emails with these embedded tracking links, based on the image server's URL in the links. Someone should compile a list of these URLs, as well as senders, and then distribute them similar to Adblock filter subscriptions. I personally don't want to see any emails of this sort, unless I've whitelisted them. This filtering functionality could be incorporated into Spamassassin et. al. And regarding personal "return-receipt" type functionality embedded like in the article, I don't want to see them either. Emails from boss? No, problem, I don't have a boss.

Regarding exposure of your IP address when opening any remote image, that really is a problem. It strongly argues for going through a proxy of some kind or functionality like gmail has (although then you get all the Goggle tracking).

62 posted on 02/12/2014 8:49:11 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Virtually EVERY e-mail client or web mail system includes an option to not view images with e-mail.

There is NOTHING unique about gmail in having an option to block images, including one-pixel “web bugs.” Everyone has that. Everyone. The only question is whether or not that “feature” it turned on to show images, or turned off to not show images, by DEFAULT.

Sometimes it is not set for best privacy and the user has to take responsibility himself or herself and turn off images.

As to the problem you cite, tracking, “although then you get all the Goggle tracking” — that is the reason to use other e-mail and not gmail.


63 posted on 02/12/2014 9:07:57 PM PST by Weirdad (Orthodox Americanism: It's what's good for the world! (Not communofascism!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

If the recipient is not using Gmail.... There’s no way that Gmail is tracking any activity on the account without the user being aware and involved.


64 posted on 02/12/2014 9:12:59 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

Well we all know its about money.


65 posted on 02/12/2014 9:13:13 PM PST by Baseballguy (pharaphase (If someone does not believe in heaven or hell - they should not care where they go))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Weirdad
Virtually EVERY e-mail client or web mail system includes an option to not view images with e-mail. There is NOTHING unique about gmail in having an option to block images, including one-pixel “web bugs.” Everyone has that. Everyone.

Everyone agrees with what you're saying there -- no new information. I want to filter out emails containing web bugs whether or not I am displaying remote images.

66 posted on 02/12/2014 9:21:17 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
If the recipient is not using Gmail.... There’s no way that Gmail is tracking any activity on the account without the user being aware and involved.

But as has been shown, clicking on an embedded link (or showing images by default) reveals information regardless of the recipient's email system.

67 posted on 02/12/2014 9:23:44 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: steve86

And so the user is aware and involved. Yes.


68 posted on 02/12/2014 9:36:53 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
If the recipient is not using Gmail.... There’s no way that Gmail is tracking any activity on the account without the user being aware and involved.

Gmail is not doing the tracking. Streak.com is doing the tracking, and Gmail is just the platform they are using to deliver the tracking information to their clients.

If you don't want to be tracked, don't let your email client fetch the web bug images and don't allow your client to honor Return-receipt or DSN requests. If you are using Gmail as your email client, you need to disable automatic image loading and refuse any read-receipt requests (see here for a demo on that). If you are using some other email client, RTFM.

69 posted on 02/12/2014 10:05:06 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Weirdad

I’m actually not a huge Google fan, I just find it useful for what I need. I would have some concerns about privacy if I used it for illegal activity.

As has been demonstrated by others and was my original point, it is not Gmail that tells readers all this information, it is a third party add on.

I did not use crusade because of your previous posting history, but because of your stated intention to stop corresponding with those with gmail and recommendation that FR policy ban the use of gmail addresses. I was not using crusade in a pejorative sense, it just seemed your stance was quite vigorous and aggressive. I sincerely wish you the best of luck with that.


70 posted on 02/13/2014 5:37:49 AM PST by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob; Slings and Arrows

71 posted on 02/14/2014 9:07:36 AM PST by a fool in paradise ("Health care is too important to be left to the government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson