Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo

Here’s the problem with inertial confinement. Even if a pulse hit break even, it will be a while until the system can fire the next pulse. There is a lot of residual heat left in the neodynium glass rods used in the lasers, and that heat has to be dissipated before the next firing. There have also been incidents where a mere speck of dust on a glass rod shatters when the xenon flashtube goes off to excite the glass into lasing. There are also tremendous stresses on the capacitors used to fire the flashtubes, and capacitors have been known to explode (these are big capacitors).
The inertial confinement devices at Lawrence Livermore are more for testing and verifying weapons physics.


24 posted on 02/12/2014 4:59:42 PM PST by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Hayek

Here’s the problem with inertial confinement.
***The problem with such confinement systems is that you’re trying to confine atoms on 6 degrees of movement at one single time.

It would be simpler to attempt confinement of one or 2 degrees of movement rather than all 6. That’s the difference between Cold Fusion, where the hydrogen atoms are already being confined in a metallic cage, and plasma fusion, where there is zero confinement to start with.


26 posted on 02/12/2014 7:17:17 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson