Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: longfellowsmuse

I don’t think it is appropriate timing, when so many are out of work, for this dress. Maybe Robinson didn’t pay a dime for it, and Herrera was thrilled to make it for her, but it is still profligate and confirms that she is in it for the spoils and the graft and thinks she is Beyonce and doesn’t care about the abysmal state of our country.

She is not just some dame who married a millionaire. No one cares what that dame blows her husband’s money on.

She is supposed to be First Lady, but she is more like Porky Pig.


26 posted on 02/12/2014 6:01:26 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk

We will have to agree to disagree. The problem is when we criticize Michelle’s choice of dress ( assuming it was not purchased by tax payer funds) we are engaging in the same class warfare that the democrats do their best to incite.

No, she is not just some dame who married a millionaire, but she does have the right to purchase for herself to wear what she would like. You are wrong people do care what the dame who marries the millionaire spends their money on. We must be careful not to fall into the same trap of envy that is used as an argument to redistribute wealth.

Now, we can give our opinions all day about if the dress is flattering or not, but Beyonce probably would have worn something classless that would have made even the randy french prime minister blush.


29 posted on 02/12/2014 6:11:36 AM PST by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson