I guess that is possible, though unlikely. All I ever wanted was the truth. That’s all Joe ever asked for on his death bed.
If Ziegler stumbles on an inconvenient or uncomfortable truth, it doesn’t make it less of a truth.
This is the most bizarre and misunderstood case ever, imo. We may never know the truth. The sitting AG for the state of PA (who ran on getting to the bottom of this) just issued a one year update on her investigation which said basically nothing.
GS, GS, and TC await trial - years after they were charged. There’s no trial date set. There’s no end in sight.
It just goes on and on and on.
At least Ziegler cares about the truth. More than I can say for most of the posters here.
apparently you can’t handle the truth. The court case gives you all the truth you will ever need
I had occasion to read a bit about “recovered memory” when I was gathering some info for a paper my daughter was working on. “Recovered memory” belongs squarely in scare quotes; any shrink worth his salt can brainwash anyone who submits to psychoanalysis into believing just about anything. Memory is simply to ephemeral.
I also, subsequently, saw my mother’s memory degrade under the onslaught of Alzheimers - and I saw how she became certain of things which simply couldn’t have been much farther from the truth. Spooky.
So if any of the evidence in the trial had anything to do with "recovered memory," to that extent I would have rejected it out of hand if I had been on the jury.