Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ImJustAnotherOkie; Alamo-Girl
When it comes to the Age of the Earth the literal interpretation looses all credibility.

Let's deal with mistakes and assumptions based on those mistakes. You assume, for example, that your sentence above its correct.

In reality, it isn't. You have misused the word "loose".

Now, what if in the text, that you say can't be taken literally, you are also making assumptions that are not warranted?

This is by no means an attempt to correct your sentence; it is rather an attempt to show how assumptions have consequences.

23 posted on 02/08/2014 5:31:32 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Indeed, dear brother in Christ! I pinged you to a similar discussion on another thread in case you wish to pursue this sidebar over there as well.


28 posted on 02/08/2014 8:01:57 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

The best you can do? So the earth is 40,000 years old?


36 posted on 02/08/2014 1:05:20 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson