Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MeshugeMikey

I can agree with you that there are many passages that aren’t to be taken literally, but rather symbolically, especially when dealing with the Book of Revelation, the Book of Daniel, certain passages elsewhere, etc.

Other books, though, such as Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, should be taken literally.

While this isn’t all-encompassing, it does show where I stand.


12 posted on 02/06/2014 10:42:04 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Laissez-faire capitalist

It illustrates your willingness to read the bible as it was written!

It also illustrates why we should all read the whole of the bible ..do a great deal of cross checking and contextual investigation, which you’ve made clear that you have in fact done.

If one insists on adopting a “young earth” position it would behoove one to determine what the chronological references actually were meant to state.

Micro evolution yes...Macro Evolution No Way.


14 posted on 02/06/2014 10:46:59 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("When you meet the unbelievers, strike at their necks..." -- Qur'an 47:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson