Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nine Years after Kelo, the Seized Land Is Empty
National Review ^ | 2/5/2014 | Alec Torres

Posted on 02/06/2014 6:26:22 AM PST by rktman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: rktman
Justice O'Connor:

Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random. The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms. As for the victims, the government now has license to transfer property from those with fewer resources to those with more. The Founders cannot have intended this perverse result.

This is what the peice of land that Kelo's house occupied now looks like:

After the houses were destroyed, nothing happened. No R&D complex, no gentrified condos, no influx of high-net-worth PhDs. Nothing. Shortly after this photo, news came from Pfizer, they were leaving the city.

21 posted on 02/06/2014 11:23:16 AM PST by Daffynition ("If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." ~ Henry Ford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

*sigh* I wish you knew more facts about the Kelo case....or what it is like to be *FORCED* off your land for an ill conceived government whim.

My grandparents who were dirt poor farmers had it happen to them....the upheaval to their pastoral life left them both dead within 2 years of the ED act.

It isn’t *always* about the money, FRiend .


22 posted on 02/06/2014 11:29:00 AM PST by Daffynition ("If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." ~ Henry Ford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963

Sounds like Providential justice rendered on those that forced the sale.


23 posted on 02/06/2014 11:31:11 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The Kelo decision is the worst SCOTUS decision since Dred Scott.

There is no way to misinterpret the plain language of Constitution as it applies to eminent domain...this was a deliberate act by five tyrants in black robes to eviscerate the concept and importance of private property rights.


24 posted on 02/06/2014 11:43:45 AM PST by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

And it was the court’s conservatives that made this decision, seeing it as a state’s rights matter.


25 posted on 02/06/2014 11:54:28 AM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

LOL! On the contrary, we done been schooled that there are plenty of ways to misinterpret the plain language in the Constitution and in the Bill of Rights. Per the “lyin’ king”, “Constitution, Bill of Rights? We don’t need no steenkin Constitution or Bill of whatever. I gots me a ball point and I ain’t afraid to use it.”


26 posted on 02/06/2014 11:55:09 AM PST by rktman (Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson