I’m just confused now - can’t figure if you like gov intervention in some areas but want less in others, or if you just want to get pot legalized no matter what the gov intervention might be, or not be. Can’t seem to keep up with your line of reasoning these days
What is troubling you?
I think it is foolish to have a war against a mild intoxicant which many people enjoy and know to be akin to alcohol in its effects.
I don’t think captive audiences should be exposed to dirty air.
I think business owners, like bars, should be free to choose if they want to run a smoking or non-smoking bar. Tobacco, that is.
Since the effects of pot are intoxicating compared to tobacco (which is merely noxious) I don’t think people should have to be exposed who don’t want it.
What is unclear?
BTW, it is a pretty clear comcept that I can only enjoy something if it does not affect you. I can swing my fist, but not hit your face.
If I am waiting in line at the supermarket, you don’t have the right to blow smoke at me.