Of course. I understand completely. The idea that a typewriter is constrained to print characters in specific positions is far too complex for your untrained mind to grasp.
Why, the concept is just mind-boggling! One must be a veritable Sherlock Holmes to comprehend this evidence! And all this time we thought you were *SO* intelligent because of the ready way you've always rode to Obama's defense with a garbage truck full of legal dreck.
Obviously opining on law requires far less knowledge and intelligence than does comprehending the characteristics of a typewriter. I expect this is certainly true in your case anyway.
More like you have the wit to realize that you can't spin this to your favor and so you just want this cup to pass before you.
Well, Honesty isn't very useful for either Lawyers or Obama apologists.
I’ll still wait for someone to present the typewriter line spacing theory to Triers of Fact (including a Grand Jury composed of representative American citizens) and have the theory subjected to cross-examination.
Since the theory appears to be based on examination of digital reproductions of photocopied documents, I remain skeptical but I’m open to changing my mind.
I’m surprised that the line-spacing position hasn’t yet made it beyond Internet blogs.