I think we here would be more interested in hearing you comment regarding the anomaly. You've spent the last year promoting procedural kabuki dance above all other considerations, and so now we would like to see you deal with an actual fact for a change.
How about you opine on how a document could be genuine when the typed characters don't rest where they should? Alternatively, a concession that it appears to be fake is also acceptable. (though I won't hold my breath.)
I leave opinions that are outside my areas of expertise to the experts. I would never pretend to possess expertise in line spacing, OCR, Adobe Illustrator PDF optimization, kerning, Mixed Raster Content or the like.
As you are well aware, my primary interest has always been in the judicial process regarding Article II, Section One eligibility.
If there are indeed “unexplained anomalies,” let expert witnesses explain them to a grand jury, to a judge/jury or to a congressional committee.