"By requesting the verification I can now report to thousands of constituents that we did what can be done and he is qualified to be on the ballot," Bennett said.Again, "matching" is meaningless.Bennett said he had not actually opened the email as of 7 p.m. Tuesday, but was confident it contained the information he asked for.
Federal Rule of Evidence 1005—COPIES OF PUBLIC RECORDS TO PROVE CONTENT
The proponent may use a copy to prove the content of an official record — or of a document that was recorded or filed in a public office as authorized by law — if these conditions are met: the record or document is otherwise admissible; and the copy is certified as correct in accordance with Rule 902(4) or is testified to be correct by a witness who has compared it with the original. If no such copy can be obtained by reasonable diligence, then the proponent may use other evidence to prove the content.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_1005
The Hawaii state Registrar of Vital Statistics “COMPARED” the whitehouse.gov PDF image of the Long Form Birth Certificate to the original Long Form Birth Certificate and he found that the DATA “matched.”