[CpnHook]

Very carefully threading the needle, aren’t you?

I have no need to thread anything here. I contend the essential question:

"What Barack Obama born in Hawaii?"

was verified in the affirmative point-blank by the Hawaii Dept. of Health:

“[I] verify the following:
1. A birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.”

Now I know you and others aren't going to say "OK, that settles the question." I'm merely pointing out here why pretty much everyone else on this planet will read that to in fact settle the question (at least in our legal, Full Faith & Credit system where every state attests to its records and that is then given accord by all others).

The birth record would show “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. Would the record include the hand written “notations” Abercrombie refers to?

Yes. That's one reason perhaps why Onaka used the words "matches the information" rather than "true and complete copy" as the Hawaiian original contains medical or other information that can't and wasn't released with the White House version.

That Dr. Onaka verified Obama's Hawaiian birth is highly relevant as to the eligibility question. Whether Dr. Onaka verified each and every other tidbit of information on the BC is irrelevant as none of that other stuff bears in the least on the eligibility question.

[Red Steel]

No Crook, playing dumb as usual, Onaka “verified” what he had on record. He did not verify if the record(s) are accurate. LoL. In Obama’s case, his BS “vital records” could have come from anywhere.

[Ray76]

What you contend is the “essential question” is a partial question.

Also, as has been thoroughly discussed on FR, “matching” does not imply completeness. Half-truths support a lie.

[MMaschin]

That Dr. Onaka verified Obama's Hawaiian birth is highly relevant as to the eligibility question. Whether Dr. Onaka verified each and every other tidbit of information on the BC is irrelevant as none of that other stuff bears in the least on the eligibility question.

The truth is that Onaka DID NOT verify anything. If you look at the image of the 'verification' that has been posted, it clearly shows the initials of the person who stamped Onaka's name to the document.

Also, I'm still waiting for an reply to the post (#195) that clearly shows elements of the BC file released by the WH were copied and pasted from other elements on the file.

[DiogenesLamp]

Nobody is buying the carefully worded lawyer lingo. You can keep repeating it, but you aren’t persuading anyone that it proves anything.