I know that Hayes as a hardcopy document handwriting expert would never get qualified to opine on the technical issues relevant to the WHLFBC. (Not that the issue will ever come up in any court.).
But you seem to avoid discussion on any of the substantive points I make.
Sure Obamabot. By Foggy LoL.
In actuality, not by him. And not by anyone, since Zullo has made it clear he's not ever going to release or use his precious Hayes affidavit in any way whatsoever. No one has to refute 'evidence' that Zullo is too chicken to release. Zullo does the job all on his own.
I don’t get into continuous hours of discussion with BS’ing leftists who are concerned with legitimizing and keeping the lying Obama in office. OBot, Obama has put forth many fraudulent documents. So what is your screen name at Fogbow?
Dude, don’t fall for the BS. I can’t believe people expect anyone to weigh the evidence when the evidence in question hasn’t even been released yet.
“I know that Hayes as a hardcopy document handwriting expert would never get qualified to opine on the technical issues relevant to the WHLFBC.”
Hayes is both a document and handwriting expert and has testified repeatedly in that capacity apparently without being disqualified in a Daubert hearing, which he would have been if there were any grounds for his disqualification as an expert. Numerous document experts have pointed to typewriter-related issues which could prove that the BC is a forgery before it was ever placed in a Xerox to be copied.
I see no evidence that Hayes has ever claimed to be an expert in Xerox copier technical issues and I see no evidence that Zullo is relying on any analysis by Hayes of Xerox specific technical issues, if that is what you are getting at.