So... the birth certificate at the white hut is legitimate, and the birth narrative is as Bill Ayers, er- I mean Barry Soetoro, doh, I mean Barack Hussein Obama wrote it?
Humor break- Do you know Captain Crunch?
The State of Hawaii affirms the information is accurate. Under our Constitution (Art. IV, Sec. 1) that means it's "legitimate" (though, obviously, a digital scan of a copy of an original -- which is what the WHLFBC purports to be -- couldn't be used formally in court, etc.)
and the birth narrative is as Bill Ayers, er- I mean Barry Soetoro, doh, I mean Barack Hussein Obama wrote it?
If the 'birth narrative' (meaning those events relating to Obama's earliest years) is in any way incorrect, then it may be that events were consciously manipulated in such a way Obama himself may not be aware. (Who the heck remembers anything from before about age 4?) But until there is a competing narrative that is documented and consistent (i.e., not the current multiple alternative fathers, birthplaces, etc., that are bandied about), the Occam's Razor analysis still favors the 'official' version.
Humor break- Do you know Captain Crunch?
Yes, jolly good seafarer, despite his rather prosaic Imperial uniform. That Jack Sparrow character, on the other hand, I find pretentious. :)