[William Tell]

AEMILIUS PAULUS said: " A man can carry firearms if he has a specific purpose such as carrying jewels and/or sums of money or is required to go into dangerous areas. "

So, according to your counter-revolutionary thinking, the government was fully justified in sending the army to confiscate arms in and around Boston in 1775?

Where did this notion come from that a person's jewels or money are more important than a person's life or the lives of his loved ones?

Ask your wife whether or not the "texter" she mentioned assaulted the shooter prior to the shooting.

[AEMILIUS PAULUS]

Did the shooter yell "DRAW HOSS" before he shot the poor soul. After all we have to have some ethics when we shoot our neighbor. Let us see! We can shoot our fellow drivers on the streets whenever they cut us off. A minor accident at the inter section can lead to the famous shoot out known throughout history and myth as "The Gun Fight at Willow and Pine." Some one picks a flower in your yard you of course can defend your property by shooting the poor 70 year old woman who offended the laws against theft. And of course we must not forget we can encourage the drunken screaming and shouting in the neighborhood bar just before "Ole Hoss" says to "One Eyed Charlie" "DRAW you S.O.B.

Open carry at will is a recipe for living in a lunatic asylum with the nuts well armed. No thanks. By extreme demands to carry at will eventually the abuses will become so bad that we will all lose our rights to own and possess firearms.

Once again why did the citizens of 19th century western American towns overwhelmingly forbid the open carrying of firearms within their town limits? Please answer the question.No open carry nut ever does answer my question. The answer is simple The people of those days experienced the fruits of unrestricted open carry and rejected the doctrine.