
Drs. Abby van Den Berg and Tim Perkins of the University of Vermonts Proctor Maple Research Center, with the simple-looking invention that could radically change the maple syrup industry.

1 posted on
02/03/2014 10:44:37 AM PST by
Theoria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Theoria
2 posted on
02/03/2014 10:48:16 AM PST by
1rudeboy
To: Theoria
It's the sugar, not the water that counts.
If a tree has no crown where does the sugar come from year after year?
3 posted on
02/03/2014 10:50:00 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: Theoria
This will turn the Maple Syrup World upside down.
Only problem a bunch of stubs sticking out of the ground with what looks like feeding tubes won’t be too attractive.
To: Theoria
5 posted on
02/03/2014 10:51:37 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: Theoria
Maple syrup time happens before the tree leafs out so why would anyone think the sap comes from the crown?
6 posted on
02/03/2014 10:51:54 AM PST by
DManA
To: Theoria
Based on the observation that one of the mature trees in the study that was missing most of its top was still yielding high volumes of sap, they hypothesized that the maples were possibly drawing moisture from the soil and not the crown. Previously, they had presumed that the sap dripping from tap holes was coming from the upper portion of the tree. But, if the tree was missing most of its crown then, they surmised, it must be drawing moisture from the roots. Good grief! Anyone who's cut down a maple or birch in the Spring will see sap pouring out of the stump! Not much of a revelation.
8 posted on
02/03/2014 10:53:39 AM PST by
raybbr
(I weep over my sons' future in this Godforsaken country.)
To: Theoria
Previously, they had presumed that the sap dripping from tap holes was coming from the upper portion of the tree. But, if the tree was missing most of its crown then, they surmised, it must be drawing moisture from the roots...This is a bizarre statement and cannot possibly be an accurate quotation. I grew up in maple sugar country and no one ever had the slightest doubt that sap rises from the roots. That's why it is best to have warm days and cold nights in February and March. The sap rises during the day's warmth and sinks back during the cold of the night. Once it reaches the ends of the branches and the tree starts to put out buds it is no longer any good for syrup. So the length of the season depends on the weather, and the weather dictates the simple capillary action of the sap.
That having been said, I see no reason why sucking it out the top should not work, other than that the tree will probably not last long.
To: Theoria
Maple Syrup is expensive so I would love to see this work and lower the price.
It also suggests that watering the ground during harvest could help the sap flow even better.
17 posted on
02/03/2014 11:11:16 AM PST by
DannyTN
(A>)
To: Theoria
Maple Syrup is expensive so I would love to see this work and lower the price.
It also suggests that watering the ground during harvest could help the sap flow even better.
18 posted on
02/03/2014 11:11:16 AM PST by
DannyTN
(A>)
To: Theoria
The economics of this are interesting. The farmers that I know who do sugaring are using land which they can’t really use for anything else. Usually this is steep terrain or areas cut by deep ravines, etc. If they go to a plantation style with rows of saplings then I assume they would need to use land which would be valuable (more valuable?) for other kinds of farming.
22 posted on
02/03/2014 11:19:45 AM PST by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: Theoria
Our cousin spent a fortune trying to develop a reverse osmosis system to shorten the boiling down process of maple sap, 30 years ago, through UofV. Was a colossal failure of a business venture.
40 posted on
02/03/2014 11:55:02 AM PST by
Daffynition
("If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." ~ Henry Ford)
To: Theoria
This reads like something from The Onion.
1. Everybody knows sap rises...but here they act like it is a new discovery.
2. How can a sapling live and keep producing after you chop off its top?
41 posted on
02/03/2014 11:56:09 AM PST by
Drawsing
(Fools show their annoyance at once, the prudent man overlooks an insult. Proverbs 12:16)
To: Theoria
Uh... how is that tree going to survive long-term if it’s been decapitated?
43 posted on
02/03/2014 11:59:36 AM PST by
OKSooner
("As the riders went on by him, he heard one call his name...")
To: Theoria
So people who use this method will be known as sapsuckers?
48 posted on
02/03/2014 12:04:57 PM PST by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
To: Theoria
Yes but how does a tree live with no top/leaves.I was under the impression the leaves via photosynthesis is the “food” trees lives on....a topless tree with no leaves is pulling all its substances from the earth...so what are the reason for green leaves? Just an alternative food source path to let the soil rest recover during the other 9 months of the year so the tree can feed on the soil during winter?..
54 posted on
02/03/2014 12:08:25 PM PST by
tophat9000
(Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
To: Theoria
A major DUH, that the roots take up the water. However, if the tree doesn’t have a nice crown or enough leaves to support it, it will die. Nope, sorry, not buying the new theory.
58 posted on
02/03/2014 12:26:22 PM PST by
bgill
To: Theoria; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.

Canada Ping!
63 posted on
02/03/2014 1:12:59 PM PST by
Squawk 8888
(I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
To: Theoria
Interesting article, but the part about the bear was quite a digression.
65 posted on
02/03/2014 1:27:42 PM PST by
Defiant
(Obama is The Bard of Canard.)
To: Theoria
I’d say they just pulled the rug out from under the Vermont Maple Syrup industry.
To: Theoria
If the method is realized, producing maple syrup on a commercial scale may no longer be restricted to those with forest land; it could require just 50 acres of arable land instead of 500 acres of forest. Furthermore, any region with the right climate for growing maples would be able to start up maple farms. Prices would come down - availability would go up. That's one yummy outcome... Thanks Drs. Abby van Den Berg and Tim Perkins... sweet stuff.
73 posted on
02/03/2014 7:31:59 PM PST by
GOPJ
(The Nation's divided between those who are to be fooled and those who do the fooling.Greenfield)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson