Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/01/2014 1:03:35 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin
 photo duh.gif
2 posted on 02/01/2014 1:05:52 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Hawkins is not the guru people make out. Like Billy Nye the Anus Guy.


3 posted on 02/01/2014 1:07:46 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

perhaps we can send a few hundred corrupted politico-leeches from WashDC to the nearest black hole to find out for sure if this theory is correct? starting with...


7 posted on 02/01/2014 1:22:21 PM PST by faithhopecharity (C?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin; betty boop; marron; Alamo-Girl; CottShop; metmom; xzins; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; ...

Going to a lot of trouble to explain there is nothing to explain . . . beep?


10 posted on 02/01/2014 1:28:39 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
I don't understand black holes so I watched a program on it the other day. It seemed to me that someone came up with an outrageous idea and others glommed on to it as truth. I still don't understand black holes.
11 posted on 02/01/2014 1:34:15 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Still Hawking has a point. A black hole is a gravitional center so strong that once something enters,then nothing not even light can escape. Never understood what the source of a such a gravitational field could be and since there is inherent energy associated with mass what happens to all that energy when mass is absorbed by a “black hole”.


12 posted on 02/01/2014 1:34:27 PM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

So bascially there is either something wrong with Hawking’s theory or there is something wrong with Einstein’s. If the “firewall” exists then general relativity is partially wrong. If it doesn’t, then the idea of Hawking radiation is partially wrong. Either way, I don’t see how entangled particles on either side of an event horizon violates the entanglement.


16 posted on 02/01/2014 1:45:18 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Hawking has always been overrated. “Einstein’s heir” my ass. And an anti-Semite to boot.


17 posted on 02/01/2014 1:51:44 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I love scientists and their “laws.”

Mother nature laughs at science.


20 posted on 02/01/2014 1:56:05 PM PST by wastedyears (The Ender's Game movie was a stupendous, colossal, galactic failure to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Fascinating stuff.


26 posted on 02/01/2014 2:16:17 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I thought that the science was settled. Deniers!


37 posted on 02/01/2014 4:33:47 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Hawking touts no time existed before the big bang, so therefore no creator exists.

...and therefore all who believe in God are dellusional.

Thanks Steven, you’re a true believer in the church of atheism and yourself (redundant, I know). Closing the door on possibility in an infinite universe.

Bitter much.


41 posted on 02/01/2014 6:45:30 PM PST by Eddie01 (Liberals lie about everything all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Stephen Hawking and a handful of other theorists exist at a
level that not even one person in a million can grasp. None of them are “the smartest person in the world” and none of them make such a claim. That is the hype of people who are
unable to grasp the subject matter these people deal with so
they devolve the issue into the realm of a “cult of personality”. There is simply not more than a dozen or more
people who have the intellect and knowledge of the subject
to accurately discuss whether or not Stephen Hawkings theories are right, wrong or somewhere in between. And these theorists will tell you that EVERYTHING they postulate is based on information currently available and
that theories change and evolve as data becomes available.
The Hubble Space Telescope did more for cosmology than all
the theorists ever alive....because hard data proves or disproves theory.


42 posted on 02/01/2014 6:57:41 PM PST by nvscanman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

never believed anything he says, sorry about his physical condition, but he is just weird. Figured he was the puppet of someone else. They could say anything and say it is him speaking...


43 posted on 02/01/2014 7:02:53 PM PST by goat granny (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Thanks for the post. Led me to Sabine Hossenfelder's blog and other interesting things. Nice family she has but too bad for her kids she's an atheist.


46 posted on 02/01/2014 8:42:41 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

PBS stations are running a new hour-long program this week on Hawking’s life and work - spent a good portion of it on his investigations into the nature of time and his popular book “A Brief History of Time” (which his editor said was a mess in its first draft form) - as explained on the program, his “No God” stance comes from his belief in the Big Bang origins of the universe and that before that event there was nothing else in existence, hence no original creator. But his description of the Big Bang is that in fact it was an explosion of a black hole, which he defines in general as resulting from the collapse of a gigantic star - so if generally we need gigantic stars to collapse to get a black hole, how can we get a big bang from an exploding black hole which had no antecedent causation - i.e. I came away from the program thinking Hawking was a bit of a hustler.....


50 posted on 02/01/2014 9:53:57 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I love black holes

Imagine matter so dense a teaspoon of it on earth would weigh more than a supertanker full of crude

No wonder it sucks in and compresses everything around it into its own mass

Space

I dig it man....pass that bong hoss


53 posted on 02/02/2014 1:02:41 AM PST by wardaddy (wifey instructed me today to grow chapter president beard back again....i wonder why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Gotta give Hawking credit....the little worm lives for poontang
God love him (even as Hawking denys HIM)


54 posted on 02/02/2014 1:05:25 AM PST by wardaddy (wifey instructed me today to grow chapter president beard back again....i wonder why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

BRING IT: Stephen Hawking Says Higgs Boson Research Could Destroy The Universe
http://geekologie.com/2014/09/bring-it-stephen-hawking-says-higgs-boso.php


58 posted on 09/10/2014 9:13:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson