Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
Well, that's certainly the position taken by the "Free Amanda at Any Cost" people. Don't forget they also argued that the DNA that was "too low" was also "too contaminated" as a fall-back position.

It's amazing that when the machine was pushed past the parameters they needed, it happened to give results that matched exactly with Meredith's DNA, don't you think? The expert who did the DNA test on this knife is also the person who ID's Guede's DNA at the scene. If she's incompetent and lied about Meredith, why should we trust her on Guede?

329 posted on 01/31/2014 2:23:01 PM PST by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster
If she's incompetent and lied about Meredith, why should we trust her on Guede?

That's simple -- they can bring in a whole gaggle of experts to test Guede's DNA again and again and again because they have so much of it from the crime scene.

But they have no more knife material -- so no more tests can be done.

They should have used the same guidelines for both materials and let it stand -- but they didn't.

It's called a double standard. It shows intent on their part to bend what ever rules they had to to get the results they wanted.

331 posted on 01/31/2014 2:34:09 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson