Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip
I guess you missed the thread were I actually gave some of it.

There is more evidence against Knox than 90% of people in jail for murder in the U.S. So you all should be trying to get them out to.

Some of the evidence:

-Amanda Knox knew that Meredith had been sexually assaulted, before the police revealed that to anyone. How can anyone explain that?

-Amanda and Rafael lied and said they were at his house. Then when that was proved a lie, they said they were at her place, where the murdered occurred. I think that at a later point, they again claimed they were at his house.

-Everything Knox said to the police was a lie, and she changed her story multiple times.

-She lied about texts from Patrick Lumumba. When confronted of evidence of that lie, she claimed she witnessed Lumumba rape and kill Meredith? Why in the world would she do that? The police still hadn't released the info that Meredith was sexually assaulted, but Knox knew it.

-When it was proven that Lumumba was not involved she changed her story again.

-The murder weapon had her DNA on it. Meredith's bra had Rafael's DNA on it.

The crime had been staged to look like a robbery. Rafael and Amanda knew that nothing had been stolen from the third roommate, before she came home and checked.

-She lied to police that Meredith always kept her room locked, and tried to steer the police away from Meredith's room until the third roommate came home and said Meredith's door was always unlocked. Amanda and Rafael left the area when they broke Meredith's door down.

-Amanda and Rafael were at the scene, had guilty knowledge, and lied about everything involving what happened? It was staged to look like a robbery, and Rafael and Amanda channeled the police into thinking it was just a robbery for as long as possible.

174 posted on 01/30/2014 2:39:42 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
Amanda Knox knew that Meredith had been sexually assaulted, before the police revealed that to anyone. How can anyone explain that?

Simple --

She saw the body without clothes on and assumed that she had been sexually assaulted.

But her assumption was premature as forensics subsequently proved that she had NOT been sexually assaulted.

All of which means that she wasn't there to know that she had NOT been sexually assaulted.

You really need a new gig --

179 posted on 01/30/2014 2:46:41 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Thank you. We have idiots on this thread who think that evidence was all made up God knows why. As if if Italy has suddenly turned in some country run under Sharia law. It’s amazing isn’t it how good looking people get so much sympathy in this world. Same kind of crap went on with the good looking serial killers like Ted Bundy, Richard Ramirez, even though the evidence was absolutely, utterly overwhelming people STILL insisted they were innocent!!


195 posted on 01/30/2014 3:07:41 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Hitlery: Incarnation of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“There is more evidence against Knox than 90% of people in jail for murder in the U.S.”

Source?


202 posted on 01/30/2014 3:19:32 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Capitol to the districts: "May the odds be ever in your favor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson