Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yaelle
Because there is a mountain of evidence. Especially her own lies. She kept changing her story. First she was at her boyfriend's house, then when they proved that she wasn't, she was at the scene and she accused someone else. But of all the other evidence, explain to me this: How did Amanda know that Meredith was sexually assaulted before anyone else did? If she wasn't part of the crime she couldn't know that?

And how did she and her boyfriend know nothing was stolen before the other roommate came in and checked her stuff?

137 posted on 01/30/2014 2:13:20 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Looks like I came to this thread late but you may want to direct people to an Ann Coulter article with some good info on the first convition.

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-09-07.html


142 posted on 01/30/2014 2:15:16 PM PST by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I don’t believe they ever proved she wasn’t at her boyfriend’s house. I believe they got the boyfriend to recant his testimony that she was at his house.


153 posted on 01/30/2014 2:21:54 PM PST by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I don’t believe they ever proved she wasn’t at her boyfriend’s house. I believe they got the boyfriend to recant his testimony that she was at his house.


154 posted on 01/30/2014 2:21:54 PM PST by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson