Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alissa
I don't know if she was guilty.

As for 'nonexistent' evidence, there were the six 37 bloody footprints found on the carpet with luminol, the same size as Amanda's shoes. There were the five drops of blood in the bathroom mixing Amanda's and Meredith Kercher's DNA. Of the two knives used to kill Amanda Kercher, one matched in size and length one of Amanda's kitchen knives, which had Amanda's DNA on the handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade.

There was Amanda's purchase of cleaning products after the murder, the mopping of Kercher's bathroom floor, and Amanda's borrowing of her boyfriend's mop.

There was Amanda taking a shower in the bathroom after the murder and claiming not to see the bloody footprint on the bath mat.

There was more.

On the other hand, Amanda was subjected to police misconduct and prosecutorial misconduct. She was subject to Anti-American prejudice.

The media tried her case in public, using Amanda's inadmissible journal and inadmissible witness statements.

We've discussed evidence, innocent arguments for evidence, Italian misconduct, and the confession of Rudy Guede (which places Amanda and her boyfriend at the scene with him) at some length in this earlier thread.

120 posted on 01/30/2014 2:04:56 PM PST by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster
...all of which you know about second-hand, through the media.

Like I told a friend of mine once: Don't ever appear on TV in an orange jumpsuit.

144 posted on 01/30/2014 2:15:37 PM PST by Oberon (John 12:5-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson