Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Politicalkiddo
Thought it was supposed to be the woman’s “choice”.

In this case you don't want to go there. Apparently the woman left behind directives to not have life support. Fortunately state law has trumped that due to her pregnancy. So far.
17 posted on 01/24/2014 1:18:59 PM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: TalonDJ

I thought her husband just claimed that. I’m still rather suspicious in the husband’s role in this...


18 posted on 01/24/2014 1:21:34 PM PST by Politicalkiddo (Forgiveness is the fragrance that the violet sheds on the heel that has crushed it. -M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TalonDJ

I do not believe she left behind a directive. I belive it is her husband who is claiming that she didn’t want to be kept alive on life support.

Never trust your family.


20 posted on 01/24/2014 1:22:54 PM PST by beandog (All Aboard the Choo Choo Train to Crazy Town)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TalonDJ

she didnt leave directives

it is all hearsay by her family that she never wanted to live this way

well, d’oh, who does?

But bet they never asked her if she was pregnant and the baby had a chance, would she want them to pull the plug?

I just don’t get this family
They do not deserve that child, for sure
There are adopters waiting for the baby regardless of his condition


28 posted on 01/24/2014 1:41:54 PM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson