To: doug from upland
“The only reason it bothers me is it seems like it’s an accepted way of calling someone the N-word nowadays. It’s like everybody else said the N-word and they said thug and they’re like, ‘that’s fine,’ That’s where it kind of takes me aback. It’s kind of disappointing because they know. What is the definition of a thug, really?”
~ Richard Sherman
"Thug" is now a racist word? LOL.
11 posted on
01/23/2014 12:21:09 PM PST by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: onyx
“The only reason it bothers me is it seems like it’s an accepted way of calling someone the N-word nowadays. It’s like everybody else said the N-word and they said thug and they’re like, ‘that’s fine,’ That’s where it kind of takes me aback. It’s kind of disappointing because they know. What is the definition of a thug, really?” ~ Richard Sherman "Thug" is now a racist word? LOL. My Thug!
36 posted on
01/23/2014 3:09:35 PM PST by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
To: onyx
"Thug" is now a racist word? LOL. He was confused. He thought someone called him a "Chicago thug."
37 posted on
01/23/2014 3:17:00 PM PST by
Cyber Liberty
(H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson