Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: kjam22

To say the non-call had no effect on the game is likely right, but...to say that play had no outcome on the game is flat out wrong.

Just wrong.

And it was NOT a clean hit, it should have been a penalty. That is CLEAR and cannot be refuted from the video record. You CANNOT hit a defender more than five yards down the field before the ball touches an offensive player.

You just cannot. You can say it was not an intentionally dirty play (which I don’t think it was either) but you CANNOT say it was a clean hit. If the ball has not reached the offensive target, and the defender can clearly see that and is making a line for the target and gets hit before the ball arrives, that is NOT a clean hit.

THAT is cut and dried, a penalty.


119 posted on 01/20/2014 3:59:39 PM PST by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

So the penalty would have been for an illegal pick. Not for unnecessary roughness. Not for a shot to the head. Not for anything dirty. It was a CLEAN hit. It was timed 2 tenths of a second early... but that doesn’t make it a dirty hit. It makes it an illegal pick. A clean hit during an illegal pick. To say it wasn’t a clean hit, means you do not know what a clean hit is.


121 posted on 01/20/2014 4:01:44 PM PST by kjam22 (my newest music video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7gNI9bWO3s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson