<>Yes, they will and should ...<>
NO — Yes, they did and Yes, they do.
The Oulsons had lawyers and have lawyers.
And those lawyers that they did have and do have said that Reeves started the row both times as I cited to you — that is what I was responding to.
To be correct and assure that the house is built out of brick rather than straw, the police report said that Oulson threw a “BAG of popcorn” — not “popcorn”.
Cummings sitting with his son two seats away said that he saw “popcorn thrown”.
Someone threw popcorn and someone threw a bag of popcorn — two separate things.
BTW I am assuming that the “gossip blog” Hollywood Life is Hollywood Florida not Hollywood California and their little bunny intern just might have been there in court and scooped the other New York Times. It’s happened before and will again.
And as far as the use of the term “weak” by lawyers on both sides of the table at a hearing being a coincidence — it happens all the time as they mock each other’s arguments in court. It is not unusual at all.
If that’s all you got — It’s Weak.
You assume wrong... HL is a celebrity gossip site.
I also don’t think you can conclude that statements regarding thrown popcorn and a thrown bag of popcorn refers to separate events.
Mr. Cummings statement that popcorn was thrown but he didn’t know by whom is very generic.
I still have yet to see any sourced witness statement that Reeves threw popcorn, only that he initiated confrontations both times (and that from the lawyers with a vested interest in a civil suit).
This needlessly flogging the shooter who is being held and tried for 2nd murder doesn’t change the fact that Oulsen should have put the phone away or left the theater to continue using it.
Petty insistence that the rules (and good manners) are for other people meets anal retentive rules enforcer had tragic consequences.
I really hope Reeves takes a plea deal and saves Oulsen’s wife the trauma of testifying at trial.