When the initial story broke one witness Cummings said that “popcorn was thrown” — with no identification of who threw it or whether it came from one or both.
Then later we are told that Oulson threw “a bag of popcorn” and what is continually described is that it was a BAG of popcorn — not popcorn — but a BAG of popcorn.
So if Oulson threw the BAG of popcorn — then who threw the popcorn???
And remember that Oulson’s attorney said that Reeves started the row both times — when he first got there and when he returned from tattling.
AND Reeves attorney and Reeves have lied outright about the dark colored UFO that they claimed that Oulson threw. Police searched for the UFO and found nothing and said they found nothing thus painting Reeves and his attorney as prefabricators. Their credibility is in the toilet.
Oulsen doesn’t have an attorney, he’s dead.
The police report says Oulsen threw his popcorn. Cummings is not the only witness.
I’m not defending Reeves. He was clearly in the wrong in using deadly force, IMO. I just don’t see a valid self defense claim over popcorn. I also think Reeves may be displaying dementia.
That said, Oulsen also made a fatal error in judgement in participating in a petty dispute with an asshat.
And Hollywood Life is an inaccurate gossip blog.