I would not put any faith in the Hollywood Life version, it has severe problems with literacy. Most other reports quote Reeves’ attorney Escobar as saying the probable cause document was “quite weak”.
I tend to think the HL Intern responsible for this particular version is confused on the facts, if for no other reason than they seem unclear as to which part of Curtis Reeves name is his surname.
The sheriff doesn’t think the case is weak. He’s been pretty clear it was a clear case.
What do you expect him to say. He's his attorney. I would rather trust Hollywood Life than him.