Libertopians want all perversions to be legal. That is my statement. I have seen nothing to suggest otherwise.
Hm; the people I know with a "libertarian streak" seem to come off more as a government should not dictate the living of life
sorts.
Virtually the polar opposite of the statist, or collectivist; in which case I have no problem with them.
There are some "anti-libertarians" who seem to think that any agreement with any "libertarian policy/idea" is equivalent with the wholesale adoption of the Libertarian Party platform and promotion of the homosexual agenda. What's interesting in those cases is the almost bi-polar approach to law: if it agrees with my sense of morality it's good/ok, if it doesn't then no. (Which is a damn stupid stance when you're talking about the powers allowed the State — in the case of marriage, allowing the [federal] government the power to declare it only between a man and woman means ceding to them the power to [at a later date] change it to include homosexuals; so even a "win" is a loss.)
” I have seen nothing to suggest otherwise.”
Then you’re blind.