[publius911]

You realize he and his wife were on a date. Their two year old was with the babysitter. The movie hadn't started yet and he was texting with the babysitter. I'm not sure anything has been reported that suggests "the deceaced was a royal prick."

Your faulty analysis does not change a thing. Stepping out to the lobby to deal with texting "emergencies" (by definition) is not an unreasonable expectation.

[Tenacious 1]

Your faulty analysis does not change a thing.

I made no analysis. I regurgitated facts from various stories regarding the circumstances. Then I commented on the lack of reasonable evidence reported that would lead a normal person to suggest the victim was "a royal prick."

There is no argument that can be made about the validity of my post. You look silly trying to discredit me. The "royal prick" shot the evil texter in the chest after he got a face full of popcorn.

[DoodleDawg]

Stepping out to the lobby to deal with texting "emergencies" (by definition) is not an unreasonable expectation.

Neither is going to the movie with your spouse without being shot.